October 25, 2007
No indeed.
When a movie that's slated to be released at the end of the year, during Oscar season, amid all the other big blockbuster-wanna-bes, suddenly gets shunted to…ugh….end of February, one can only say, "Yikes."
How bad can it be?
It must be reallllllly bad.
After all, February and March are the bad times for movie releases (good times for book releases, though…hint, hint)–it's after the Oscar rush, before the big summer releases.
So, it's a bummer that the movie's that bad. Don't think I'll be seeing it–Eric Bana doesn't really do that much for me, and although I like Scarjo (mainly 'cause the girl has curves and isn't an emaciated paper doll *cough*KeiraKnightley*cough*).
And really, Eric Bana had no business playing the running-to-fat, pus-running-down-gouted-leg Henry VIII. I'm sorry, but that was poor casting in the extreme.
I've read one Philippa Gregory book–The Queen's Fool–and I enjoyed it (although I thought the love story/romance between the "fool" and her eventual husband was unrealistic, tacked on, and clumsy). I haven't read any other Gregory books, though everyone says The Other Boleyn Girl is the best.
So maybe I'll read it instead of watch it.
So, what do you think? Will you see the flick? Have you read the book?
And, since there's now suddenly a total glut of Tudor-set historical fiction…how do you feel about that? Tired of it? Want a different time period explored?
(Why can't someone do a series like that about Eleanor of Aquitaine? I would glom that up in a heartbeat.)
Oh, wait. Someone did. Roberta Gellis. The Roselynde Chronicles. Sexier than the Gregory books (wayy sexier), with more fictional elements, but…damn, they're some of my favorite books. Ever.